Drug Testing for Welfare Recipients is Illegal and Unnecessary Essay

medicine Testing for Welf atomic number 18 Recipients is Illegal and Unnecessary - Essay precedentEmployees are required to prove their innocence while showing no outward signs of using misappropriated medicines. Many would say that violates non only the U.S. Constitution but the precepts of any free society. A more egregious example of an overzealous drug policy is the recent growing trend to require well-being recipients, residents of public housing and other forms of public assistance to be tested for drugs prior to receiving assistance. These policies do non save cash or lower the rate of drug use. What they do is oppress and humiliate the well-nigh vulnerable of society, the poor and minorities, and constitute a considerable and unwarranted invasion of privacy. At the heart of this passionate political debate are demeaning and inaccurate portrayals of people who typically receive social welfare, characterizations that are not supported by evidence. One such stereotyp e is of the drug or intoxicant addicted welfare queen who continues to bear children so the amount of her assistance checks increase and she can buy more drugs. Drug testing the poor is unquestionable popular among voters receivable to the prevailing yet misinformed opinion that the poor are lazy and undeserving of government help, why should I work to pay for them to sit at habitation all day? is a commonly heard phrase. ... The facts, however, mirror this perception. Laws meant to purge the system from drug abusing welfare cheats do not accomplish what they are intended to do and are most likely unconstitutional. For example, drug testing people on welfare is supposed to save money, thats the main argument. The 2008 Great ecological niche caused a great financial hardship to individuals as well as all levels of government. Saving money by eliminating waste is a popular political stance but the money saved is comparatively small amount and is often exceeded by the cost to imple ment the testing law. Idaho recently commissioned a study of the likely financial impact of drug testing its welfare applicants. The study found that the be were likely to exceed any money saved. (Cohen, 2012). An extensive peer-reviewed study found that a only a small minority of public assistance programs recipients such as Medicaid, food stamps, WIC AFDC and SSI, contrary to common opinion, present drug and alcohol problems, about five percent abuse drugs and six percent have an alcohol dependency. (Grant, Dawson, 1996.) A report from the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism confirmed several(prenominal) other studies which found welfare recipients do not use or abuse drugs or alcohol at a rate higher than the general population. A separate study discovered that well-nigh three-quarters of adult drug users are have full time jobs. The arguments for drug testing welfare recipients do not square with the facts or the reality of the situation but the laws are politi cally popular due to the broadly help belief that the poor deserve unequal status and should be punished by society for their financial circumstance. This society would